TRIPLE PREFERENCE THEORY OF CHOICE UNDER RISK AND UNCERTAINTY Janne Gustafsson
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper develops a theory of choice under risk and uncertainty which, together with the associated definition of risk aversion, separates the concepts of risk aversion and diminishing marginal utility from each other. Building on separate definition of the decision maker’s two elementary preference relations—preferences over lotteries and preferences over consequences—and a set of consistency properties that link these two together, the paper derives a third preference relation on a set of “utility lotteries,” and shows that the preference functional for lotteries necessarily separates into the representation functions of the two other preference relations of the theory. The paper then demonstrates that a reasonable definition of risk aversion necessitates the use of cardinal utility, whereby it is also possible to achieve the separation result of the paper. The theory is compatible with expected utility theory, and allows for multi-attribute consequences, mean-risk preferences and state-dependent utility.
منابع مشابه
A Multi-Criteria Analysis Model under an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Environment with an Application to Production Project Decision Problems
Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) to solve complicated decisions often includes uncertainty, which could be tackled by utilizing the fuzzy sets theory. Type-2 fuzzy sets consider more uncertainty than type-1 fuzzy sets. These fuzzy sets provide more degrees of freedom to illustrate the uncertainty and fuzziness in real-world production projects. In this paper, a new multi-criteria ana...
متن کاملRisk, Ambiguity, and State-Preference Theory
The state-preference framework for modeling choice under uncertainty, in which objects of choice are allocations of wealth or commodities across states of the world, is a natural one for modeling smooth ambiguityaverse preferences. It does not require reference to objective probabilities, personalistic consequences, or counterfactual acts, and it allows for statedependence of utility and unob...
متن کاملA theory of subjective compound lotteries
We develop a Savage-type model of choice under uncertainty in which agents identify uncertain prospects with subjective compound lotteries. Our theory permits issue preference; that is, agents may not be indifferent among gambles that yield the same probability distribution if they depend on different issues. Hence, we establish subjective foundations for the Anscombe-Aumann framework and other...
متن کاملA Subjective Theory of Compound Lotteries†
We develop a Savage-type model of choice under uncertainty in which agents identify uncertain prospects with subjective compound lotteries. Our theory permits issue preference; that is, agents may not be indifferent among gambles that yield the same probability distribution if they depend on different issues. Hence, we establish subjective foundations for the Anscombe-Aumann framework and other...
متن کاملChoice theory when agents can randomize
This paper takes choice theory to risk or uncertainty. Well-known decision models are axiomatized under the premise that agents can randomize. Under a reversal of order assumption, this convexifies choice sets, and even after imposing the weak axiom of revealed preference and nonemptiness of choice correspondences, the preferences directly revealed by choice may be incomplete or cyclical. Choic...
متن کامل